To To 101.32.26.Low latency, high packet loss (4%) 101.32.42.High latency, low packet loss (1%) Delay difference 20-30 Coordinates, Tianjin Unicom what about you?

-------------------------------------------- ---------
Netizens reply: To To 101.32.26.The delay is about 100, with severe fluctuations and high packet loss (4%) Chongqing Unicom Telecommunications is worse, we are ready to refund ’ One Guangzhou Telecom VPS test 101.32.26. Data packet: sent=3435, received=2618, lost=817 (23% lost) Estimated time of the trip (in milliseconds): The shortest=109ms, the longest=129ms, the average=111ms
Netizens reply: To To China Unicom has so many choices. . . Stop playing with goose intestines More suitable for telecommunications
Netizens reply: To To I am 32.32 and I did not open long ping 1000 times and 5000 packets are not lost
Netizen reply: To To How about the landlord testing 101.32.32 Dongguan mobile results below 101.32.26. Ping statistics: Data packet: sent=276, received=267, lost=9 (3% lost), Estimated time for round trip (in milliseconds): The shortest=14ms, the longest=59ms, the average=25ms ------------------ 101.32.42. Ping statistics: Data packet: sent=321, received=316, lost=5 (1% lost), Estimated time for round trip (in milliseconds): The shortest=15ms, the longest=40ms, the average=19ms --------------------- 101.32.32.* Ping statistics: Data packet: sent=146, received=141, lost=5 (3% lost), Estimated time for round trip (in milliseconds): The shortest=18ms, the longest=43ms, the average=21ms
Netizen Reply: To To This post was last edited by a cat at 2020-7-1414:52 You... should be caused by your neighbors

Label: none